This fix affects all nodes, will fix this issue in all nodes
Github issue / Community forum post (link here to close automatically):
Co-authored-by: Michael Kret <michael.k@radency.com>
Github issue / Community forum post (link here to close automatically):
---------
Co-authored-by: Giulio Andreini <g.andreini@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: कारतोफ्फेलस्क्रिप्ट™ <aditya@netroy.in>
This change expands on the command channel communication introduced
lately between the main instance(s) and the workers. The frontend gets a
new menu entry "Workers" which will, when opened, trigger a regular call
to getStatus from the workers. The workers then respond via their
response channel to the backend, which then pushes the status to the
frontend.
This introduces the use of ChartJS for metrics.
This feature is still in MVP state and thus disabled by default for the
moment.
Story: https://linear.app/n8n/issue/PAY-926
This PR coordinates workflow activation on instance startup and on
leadership change in multiple main scenario in the internal API. Part 3
on manual workflow activation and deactivation will be a separate PR.
### Part 1: Instance startup
In multi-main scenario, on starting an instance...
- [x] If the instance is the leader, it should add webhooks, triggers
and pollers.
- [x] If the instance is the follower, it should not add webhooks,
triggers or pollers.
- [x] Unit tests.
### Part 2: Leadership change
In multi-main scenario, if the main instance leader dies…
- [x] The new main instance leader must activate all trigger- and
poller-based workflows, excluding webhook-based workflows.
- [x] The old main instance leader must deactivate all trigger- and
poller-based workflows, excluding webhook-based workflows.
- [x] Unit tests.
To test, start two instances and check behavior on startup and
leadership change:
```
EXECUTIONS_MODE=queue N8N_LEADER_SELECTION_ENABLED=true N8N_LICENSE_TENANT_ID=... N8N_LICENSE_ACTIVATION_KEY=... N8N_LOG_LEVEL=debug npm run start
EXECUTIONS_MODE=queue N8N_LEADER_SELECTION_ENABLED=true N8N_LICENSE_TENANT_ID=... N8N_LICENSE_ACTIVATION_KEY=... N8N_LOG_LEVEL=debug N8N_PORT=5679 npm run start
```
This change ensures that things like `encryptionKey` and `instanceId`
are always available directly where they are needed, instead of passing
them around throughout the code.
Nodes can have properties that have a displayOption which specifies a
version
for which node versions that property applies to. We should take this
into
account when forming the action types for a Node in the NodeList.
For example Notion node has 2 version which have different Page
operations.
Depends on: https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/pull/7195 | Story:
[PAY-837](https://linear.app/n8n/issue/PAY-837/implement-object-store-manager-for-binary-data)
This PR includes `workflowId` in binary data writes so that the S3
manager can support this filepath structure
`/workflows/{workflowId}/executions/{executionId}/binaryData/{binaryFilename}`
to easily delete binary data for workflows. Also all binary data service
and manager methods that take `workflowId` and `executionId` are made
consistent in arg order.
Note: `workflowId` is included in filesystem mode for compatibility with
the common interface, but `workflowId` will remain unused by filesystem
mode until we decide to restructure how this mode stores data.
---------
Co-authored-by: कारतोफ्फेलस्क्रिप्ट™ <aditya@netroy.in>
Story: [PAY-846](https://linear.app/n8n/issue/PAY-846) | Related:
https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/pull/7225
For the S3 backend for external storage of binary data and execution
data, the `getAsStream` method in the binary data manager interface used
by FS and S3 will need to become async. This is a breaking change for
nodes-base.
Depends on: #7164 | Story:
[PAY-838](https://linear.app/n8n/issue/PAY-838/introduce-object-store-service-for-binary-data)
This PR removes `storeMetadata` and `getSize` from the binary data
manager interface, as these are specific to filesystem mode. Also this
disambiguates identifiers:
```
binaryDataId
filesystem:289b4aac51e-dac6-4167-b793-6d5c415e2b47 {mode}:{fileId}
fileId - FS
289b4aac51e-dac6-4167-b793-6d5c415e2b47 {executionId}{uuid}
fileId - S3
/workflows/{workflowId}/executions/{executionId}/binary_data/b4aac51e-dac6-4167-b793-6d5c415e2b47
```
Note: The object store changes originally in this PR were extracted out
into the final PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: कारतोफ्फेलस्क्रिप्ट™ <aditya@netroy.in>
Github issue / Community forum post (link here to close automatically):
---------
Co-authored-by: Omar Ajoue <krynble@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: कारतोफ्फेलस्क्रिप्ट™ <aditya@netroy.in>
This PR introduces banner framework overhaul:
First version of the banner framework was built to allow multiple
banners to be shown at the same time. Since that proven to be the case
we don't need and it turned out to be pretty messy keeping only one
banner visible in such setup, this PR reworks it so it renders only one
banner at a time, based on [this priority
list](https://www.notion.so/n8n/Banner-stack-60948c4167c743718fde80d6745258d5?pvs=4#6afd052ec8d146a1b0fab8884a19add7)
that is assembled together with our product & design team.
### How to test banner stack:
1. Available banners and their priorities are registered
[here](f9f122d46d/packages/editor-ui/src/components/banners/BannerStack.vue (L14))
2. Banners are pushed to stack using `pushBannerToStack` action, for
example:
```
useUIStore().pushBannerToStack('TRIAL');
```
4. Try pushing different banners to stack and check if only the one with
highest priorities is showing up
### How to test the _Email confirmation_ banner:
1. Comment out [this
line](b80d2e3bec/packages/editor-ui/src/stores/cloudPlan.store.ts (L59)),
so cloud data is always fetched
2. Create an
[override](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/resource-override/pkoacgokdfckfpndoffpifphamojphii)
(URL -> File) that will serve user data that triggers this banner:
- **URL**: `*/rest/cloud/proxy/admin/user/me`
- **File**:
```
{
"confirmed": false,
"id": 1,
"email": "test@test.com",
"username": "test"
}
```
3. Run n8n
Github issue / Community forum post (link here to close automatically):
This PR aims to address an issue where an Error workflow cannot be
started, either due to insufficient permissions or because its settings
prevent it from being called.
The way of addressing this is by creating a failed execution for the
appointed error workflow stating the error, as can be seen below.
This means the execution itself won't start, as it's prevented before
the execution beings, but we save a "stub" execution to show the error.
